Sanjeev Kumar – Filmfare Article

Today is Sanjeev Kumar’s death anniversary. So check out this Filmfare article on him with quotes from his interviews.

  1. Avatar
    aryan 8 years ago

    Biography of Sanjeev Kumar Have a look.

  2. Avatar
    Moi 8 years ago

    Please publish more on SK a great actor – much missed.

    • Avatar Author
      sputnik 8 years ago

      Have not been able to find any interviews of his. Will surely post if I find them.

  3. saurabh
    saurabh 8 years ago

    I feel the best actor of indian cinema with deleep saab.. Nobody can match both, nd Sanjeev never copied deleep saab. Wish I could hv seen him more

  4. Avatar
    Bored 8 years ago

    Prefer SK over DK, specially since he didnt get to do much work but still regarded so highly.

  5. saurabh
    saurabh 8 years ago

    i think DK is highly regarded because of acting, not the number of films.
    and SK is also regarded highly because of acting.
    if i take your funda and apply to Amitabh and DK, amitabh should be regarded more than DK

  6. Avatar
    yakuza 8 years ago

    I have one of his interview in Hindi .. will find and post

  7. Avatar
    Bored 8 years ago

    If one dies young, he does not get the chance to build a body of work, without which building a reputation is even more difficult for any actor.

    • Avatar Author
      sputnik 8 years ago

      I think he had a good body of work. And Sanjeev played lot of old roles even while he was young. I think he is one of the rare young actors in Bollywood who could play old man roles so well. Ironically for someone who played so many old roles he did not live to be a old man in real life.

      • Avatar
        Bored 8 years ago

        Yes the irony was very tragic. I like his body of work (he acted for 20-25 yrs – and actors did a lot more work back then), but keep feeling he cud have done so much more. He died at 47 – thats the age that our Irfan is today.

  8. Avatar
    Bored 8 years ago

    Also longer u manage to hang arnd, its helps ur reputation. Amitabh’s reputation increased with his return thru KBC/old-roles and he is still one of the most recognizable brands of bollywood – even though he has only just been arnd for many yrs without major successes (at least BO wise).

    DK was working in the nineties and is more recognizable to the younger generation – main reason why his name comes up more often in online discussion these days than RK/DA. Also the better actor usually does better when they shift to character roles with age.

    Today a SRK/Aamir/Salman movie may do 200 cr along with say a hrithik movie (he is only star in that age range, so cant club him with anyone). Credit usually will go more to the Khan mainly becoz ‘hey he has been giving such hits for last 20 yrs’ – but in reality a guy like Salman was probably not even a A-lister for a decade within those 20 yr or aamir was hardly a major BO player for a similar time.

    Longevity is more useful for stars than any success – coz if they can hang arnd there is always the chance of hitting a winning streak now and then. SK was not exactly a star (more like Abhay Deol kind of actor) but same goes for them too.

    • Avatar Author
      sputnik 8 years ago

      Agree that longevity matters.

      Dilip I think had only two hits in the 60s (Ganga Jamuna and Ram Aur Shyam from less releases though) and Rajendra Kumar was the top star during the 60s. He had a horrible 70s but his comeback in the 80s in prominent older roles changed the narrative for him and enhanced his reputation. It made it seem like he was always there from the late 40s.

      Same thing with Amitabh’s comeback and now Rishi’s reputation has been enhanced since his comeback in older roles.

  9. Avatar
    Bored 8 years ago

    I think DK played the vital role in making Saudagar (91) a big hit. And his acting chops became more prominent when pitted against the stylized mannerisms of Raaj Kumar. When it comes to ‘gravitas’ – DK is way ahead of Amitabh or anyone else. That is ironical, since DK was the ‘tragic romantic hero’ while Amitabh was ‘angry young man’.

    Amitabh’s attempts to be ‘all-rounder’ in the eighties masala did cost him a lot on the long run. It is irritating to see Amitabh still trying to dance (or whatever weird jhatkas he does) on TV at this age. (And it definitely was more ridiculous than SRK’s hamming in KANK.)

  10. saurabh
    saurabh 8 years ago

    i was talking abt acting… not reputation, or sucess, fame… so acting doesn’t matter on longevity. if u have done 25-30 good films, then u can understand the acting potential i guess.

    btw agree with you o the issue which u describe… and agree with sputnik

  11. Avatar Author
    sputnik 7 years ago

    Sanjeev Kumar Interview from 1977

    Which are the roles that Sanjeev Kumar, among our more competent actors, found satisfying?

    “Very few indeed,” Sanjeev smiled. “I enjoyed doing the roles in ‘Naya Din Nayee Raat’, “Anubhav’,”Koshish’, ‘Vishwasghat’, ‘Khilona’, ‘Aandhi’ and ‘Mausam’.

    “Naya Din Nayee Raat’ offered the maximum challenge: it was the most difficult role of my career so far. I portrayed nine different characters. They were not just nine disguises; they were nine different people. Normally when a hero is in disguise he can take all the liberties he wants: even if your false moustache comes off the public won’t bother because they know you are in disguise.

    “But when you are playing different characters the public very minutely watches and tries to compare the different charac­ters. That’s why I consider my role in `Naya Din Nayee Raat’ a difficult one.”

    In portraying this role San­jeev admits he had received a lot of help from Sarosh Modi, his make-up man, and from the film’s writer and the director (Shim Singh). Unfortunately, the film didn’t run well and he was quite depressed. “After putting in all that hard work if people are not going to see what you have done how can you help feeling depressed?”

    Sanjeev considers his role in “Koshish” his best performance so far. “The main reason for this,” he says is the last scene, the climax of the film, the scene between the father and the son, which is totally meant for the actor. In that scene, I did not have any dialogue to speak, nor did I have any particular ca­mera placing to help my perfor­mance; it was completely the actor’s scene. Normally it is very difficult to get that type of a scene, where the director solely depends on the actor. If it had flopped it would have been my failure, no one else’s. I must thank Gulzar for giving me that scene, for placing all the confidence in me.

    To a very large extent an actor’s performance would de­pend upon the director and script, Sanjeev says, “Without a director, without a script, you can do nothing. The script is the most important factor and then comes the director who transforms the script into a film. Many a bad performance can be saved by a good script and good direction. The direc­tor would know where to cut the shot, whether the actor has failed in the performance, whe­ther to change the camera angles and light up the scene or the shot in a particular manner so that the faults of the actor are suppressed, or that certain fea­tures of the actor would give just the impression of what the scene demands.

    “The same way a good performance can be ruined by bad editing”, he went on. “Now if I have an emotional scene, and if I have to speak in the scene and if I have to express my feelings with just my eyes and if the camera is kept some­where behind me, the whole scene would be a waste. If the scene is taken just on the re­action of the other character and I am not seen, well, that scene is a waste as far as I am concerned. Of course it does happen that way sometimes but it must be for a certain effect, or purpose. Otherwise it goes waste. So I would say the script and the director can save a bad performance and also ruin a good performance”

    Does he relish playing old men’s roles? “Looks like it,” Sanjeev said smiling. “The way my films have been going these last few months, or years.. Most of them are old characters so I cannot say I don’t like them.”

    The very first role that he played was that of an old man. It was a stage play. He was just 21 and the character that he played was that of an old man aged 60, with six children. And guess who played his wife in the play, Shabana Azmi’s mother, Shaukat Azmi!

    Later he again played an old man in an adaptation of Ar­thur Miller’s “All My Sons” and Leela Chitnis played his wife! “These two plays gave me a reputation as an actor. A. K. Hangal was the director of the first play, and I am thankful to him that he did not give me the hero’s role in it though it was a very good role. So my first step into acting started with characterization. And being my first play, my first role, I went completely after the character and tried to imagine how he must have been, his mannerisms, his way of walking, talking, and so on.

    “But when I am playing a romantic hero, the so-called hero, I feel I have to be just myself; which is what most heroes do. Well it is just that way; you cannot say anybody is wrong or right. For example I was playing the hero in ‘Uljhan’ where I didn’t play an elderly character, I just play­ed the hero, I had to be just myself. And you do not get your battery charged unless you have something new to do. But in ‘Uljhan’ I had to be just myself. There was no challenge for the actor.

    “There have been occasions when I have refused heroes’ roles and in turn accepted roles of elderly characters. I do not have any inhibitions about play­ing any roles.”

    How does he establish rap­port with his director? “My experience is you do not deli­berately try to establish rap­port with the director. Either it is there or it isn’t there. If you are not on the same wavelength no matter how much the actor tries or no matter how much the director tries, it is useless. In just a couple of days you realize whether you can get along well with him or not. At least that has been my ex­perience”

    Sanjeev confesses that he has not liked several of his own performances. “Some films are yet to be released and I wouldn’t like to name them because the producers might sue me for giving bad publicity to their films.” What about films al­ready released? “Well, there is ‘Rocky Mera Naam’ and I have conveniently forgotten the other names.

    “Coming back to the question of rapport with the director there have been instances when, a director with whom I have discussed in private a few scenes and a few things I would like to do in the film, comes on the sets and tells me just the same things I had told him earlier. Which means the di­rector is not confident of him­self. He just repeats what I have told him and shows off as if that was his own contribution to the filth, I feel quite hurt about such things; I think it is very childish for the director to behave thus. In such circum­stances I lose interest in the film.”

    He continued: “Then some­times you find the producer does not have enough finance; he has not paid the staff, he has not paid me—of course I can forget about my payment. Are you surprised? I know I am branded a kanjoos but let me assure you I don’t care about my payment so much in such circumstances; but the rest of the unit members—how can he expect them to work with interest and enthusiasm? Then the heroine gives the dates as if she is obliging the producer. You can’t make a good film in such an atmosphere. The film is a joint effort, you need everyone associated with it charged up. And when the actor loses interest, it is surely going to affect his own work in the film. With this type of director or producer I do not repeat myself; so that I do not give a repeat bad performance.”

    Sanjeev Kumar says he is very keen on directing a film. He had been thinking about it for a long time now “But I know that requires a lot of con­centration, a lot of time which I cannot spare now. It is a big responsibility which means when I take up direction I will be doing only that and nothing else. I might act in that film or I might not, it depends on whether I get a suitable role. It is a long way off though. How can I take up direction when I am working in so many films? It is a tough job, the director’s and I do intend doing it, but a little later.”

    Sanjeev says he has a num­ber of good roles on hand. Nagi Reddi’s “Yehi Hai Zindagi” is one of them. In the first half he plays a poor worker, devoted to his wife and children and through his industry he becomes a millionaire. But he realizes he was happier in the days when he was poor. “This again is an elderly character,” he remark­ed. “The role is very important because it is a one-man show: right from the first frame to the last, the whole film is on my shoulder.”

    “In Gulshan Rai’s ‘Trishul’, directed by Yash Chopra, I am an old man too,” he continued. “Guess who are my children in the film, Shashi Kapoor and Amitabh Bachchan. It is a tough role and that’s why I am doing it. There is another good role in Raj Kumar Kohli’s film, I don’t remember the title. It is the type of role that I have not done so far.

    “Two other movies I like are Khalid Akhtar’s ‘Ladies’ Tailor’ and B. R. Chopra’s ‘Pati, Patni our Woh’. Both are social satires, comedies and I am very fond of doing comedy roles. I am not an old man in these movies.

    “Then of course there is Ma­nikda’s (Satyajit Ray) film, ‘Shatranj ke Khilari’—this role too has a slight touch of come­dy about it which I like. That would be one of my most im­portant films of 1977. Here I am playing a character obsessed with the game of chess. Again this is not an old man’s role.”

    Does he wish to play any particular role? “From the be­ginning I have never thought of playing any particular charac­ter; I have always kept myself open. But there are some cha­racters that I would be happy to portray: for instance, the Hunchback of Notredame, the role in ‘Wuthering Heights’. ‘Dr. Jekyl and Mr. Hyde’. These roles demand something more from the actor than others!

    “I have also a great fascina­tion for lawyer’s roles. My mo­ther always says I should have been a lawyer, hearing me argue when we have some con­troversy. I love discussions, arguments, it is in my nature. In playing a lawyer you get a lot of scope for using manner­isms, you can use a little style. In the court room scenes, be­cause you are not involved you can give a stylized performance sometimes, And lawyers are supposed to dramatize things and so you can over-dramatize a little.”

    Talking of his favorite direc­tors Sanjeev said: “I liked a lot working with Basu Bhatta­charya and I am looking for­ward to working with Basu Chatterji. K. Asif and Gulzar are both favorites. I like Vijay Anand; also Mahesh Bhatt whom I find very promising. I have enjoyed working with Ravi Tandon and Ramesh Sippy. As for Manikda, it is a great experience working with him.

    “But I must confess I have enjoyed best working with Mahesh Kaul. He was an actor himself; he had the ability to convey in just one sentence how he wanted you to do a scene: You knew exactly what he wanted when you were working with him.”

    What safeguards does he take for the box office success of his films? “None at all. I think they are useless, these so-called safeguards. Nobody can predict the success or failure of a film. Even big producers like Raj Kapoor have not been able to. do it. You know the fate of `Mera Naam Joker’. Dilip Kumar who makes one film in two years must be taking all the safe­guards, but then you know with what results. I do not think anybody can predict success or failure. As far as I am concern­ed I first make sure the role is satisfying and challenging, And that it is being handled by a competent director. If I am satisfied with these I do the film and try to give my best. I do not worry about a film’s fate at the box office. No release fever for me. I agree with what Raj Kapoor said once in ans­wer to the question ‘What does the audience want?’ He said: ‘What the audience wants the audience itself does not know.’ I think the best policy is to try and give your best and leave it to the audience.” (As interviewed by V. S. Gopalakrishnan in 1977)


  12. Avatar
    Moi 7 years ago

    There is a documentry out on SK next year “in search of late Sanjeev Kumar” I’m quite excited about it. Also Sholay 3-D out in January. It will be good seeing SK on the big screen.

Leave a reply

Log in with your credentials

Forgot your details?