On Aamir Khan’s birthday check out Filmfare Interview with Directors on Aamir Khan from 1997.
Filmfare Interview with Directors on Aamir Khan from 1997
Related Articles
Satyamev Jayate Full Episode 12 – Water – Every drop counts
Here is the twelfth episode of Aamir Khan’s TV Show Satyamev Jayate – Water – Every drop counts. Video...
Naseeruddin Shah on turning 70, missing acting & lessons from the pandemic
In this conversation Naseeruddin Shah reveals how he spent his 70th birthday recently, and the domestic chores he’s been...
Ek Ruka Hua Faisla Inspired/Copied from 12 Angry Men
“12 Angry Men is a 1957 American drama film adapted from a teleplay of the same name by Reginald...
Remembering Ravi: ‘Why do you want to spoil old songs?’
The legendary composer Ravi passed into the ages on Wednesday, March 7, aged 86. We salute Ravi’s brilliant musical...
Zizek’s piece on Student of the Year
Never before has a filmmaker depicted the Oedipus complex in such a captivating and thought-provoking manner as in Karan...
Blast from the Past: Tabu’s Filmfare Interview from 2001
Check out Tabu’s Filmfare Interview from 2001 on her birthday where she talks about her co stars Sanjay Dutt...
Alec Baldwin Breaks Down His Most Iconic Characters
Alec Baldwin breaks down his most iconic characters, including his roles in ’30 Rock,’ ‘Beetlejuice,’ ‘The Royal Tenenbaums,’ ‘Glengarry...
@Sputnik – Thanks for posting. Nice one.
Was this before Ishq released or after? Wasnt aware HAHK was offered to Aamir.
You are welcome. IMDB and Wikipedia have Ishq release date as 28 November 1997 but they are not always right. I think it might be before release of Ishq.
I wasn’t aware that HAHK was offered to Aamir either.
3 of these directors at that time had films under production with him – Ghulam (Vikram), Sarfarosh (Mathew) and Mann (Indra). Mansoor is his family. Aamir never worked again with RGV after Rangeela – so its not surprising that he refused to comment.
Vikram talks abt giving an action role to Aamir in Ghulam – wasnt AHA and Baazi action oriented too? Or maybe he was referring to the fact that Aamir had no success in action till that point.
Even Ghulam and Sarfarosh were small hits – nothing major (Sarfarosh was never meant to be due to its restrictive treatment). He has been a very late bloomer in action (Ghajini/D3) – probably due to his physicality. By the time Ghajini/D3 came, his reputation/stardom was such that people didnt care anymore abt how unconvincing he looks in action, and he ironically delivered some of the biggest action blockbusters in last few years.
no director will ever say negative agaisnt a star. its just another sugar coated views on aamir khan by some directors
Agree.